Actions proposées : Différence entre versions

De AG_Lille1
Aller à la navigationAller à la recherche
(Actions proposées lors de l'AG du vendredi 6 février 2009 : deplacement dans Propositions d'actions)
(page orpheline ; redirecion)
 
(Une révision intermédiaire par le même utilisateur non affichée)
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
== Actions proposées lors de l'AG du vendredi 6 février 2009 ==
+
#REDIRECT[[Propositions d'actions]]
 
 
Page en restructuration. Section déplacée dans [[Propositions d'actions]].
 
 
 
== Actions dans les composantes ==
 
 
 
=== IUT ===
 
* [[Piquet de grève IUT|Information en ''continu'' des collègues et étudiants dans le hall du bâtiment IUT]] {{new}}
 
 
 
== Actions proposées en ligne==
 
 
 
* Atelier d'édition de ce site - notez la dominance des informaticiens dans les historiques... ;-)
 
 
 
== Actions individuelles ==
 
 
 
* A propos de l'évaluation : ci-dessous la lettre que Timothy J Garrett (Associate Professor, Editor of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, University of Utah) actuellement invité au Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique de Lille 1 va envoyer au président de l'arrêt-public:
 
 
 
Dear Président Sarkozy,
 
 
I am a visiting scientist from the University of Utah in the United States,
 
currently on a year-long professorial sabbatical at the Laboratoire d'Optique
 
Atmospherique at the University of Lille. My research focuses on developing
 
improved understanding of the role of clouds in climate change.
 
 
As part of my normal duties, I am editor for the journal Atmospheric
 
Chemistry and Physics (ACP). ACP is a highly reputed journal with the highest
 
"impact factor" in our field.
 
 
A primary aspect of my editorial duties is seeking out highly qualified
 
reviewers who can offer thoughtful, well-informed criticism of submitted
 
manuscripts. It is on the basis of these reviews that I make the decision
 
whether or not an article should be accepted for formal publication in the
 
journal.
 
 
I strive for high standards of quality and absolutely depend on the reviewers
 
I choose to maintain these standards.
 
 
Following your speech of 22 January, I have become aware that the French
 
scientists I have asked to do the review of a particular article may be too
 
"mediocre" to maintain necessary standards.
 
 
As a US scientist, I only have contacts with French scientists, and so I
 
would welcome instead scientific reviews from the Ministère de la Recherche
 
for me to consider in my editorial decisions. Please could you forward to
 
your Ministry the following internet link, where Ministry officials can
 
contribute reviews in an "open review" stage of the article acceptance
 
process. Ministry contributions will be a highly valued replacement for the
 
French scientists I have asked previously.
 
 
http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/595/2009/acpd-9-595-2009.html
 
 
The reviews are open-access, and registration with ACP is straightforward.
 
 
Hoping that this solution will interest you, and that you will accept my
 
sincerest expressions of respect for you and your Cabinet,
 
 
Timothy J Garrett
 
Associate Professor
 
Editor of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
 
Department of Meteorology
 
University of Utah
 
 
 
 
 
== Fac en ville : présentation dans le centre ville de Lille d'expériences de physique, chimie et autres (à votre bon vouloir)  ==
 
voir [[Ateliers | Ateliers de grève]].
 

Version actuelle datée du 17 février 2009 à 20:57

Rediriger vers :